Jurisdiction United States Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit (CAFC)
LEON DAVIS, Claimant-Appellant
v.
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent-Appellee
176 F.4th 663 (Fed. Cir. 2026)
Leon Davis sought review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC – Veterans Court) dismissing his appeal of a Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) decision. CAFC decided that the Veterans Court committed no legal error in determining its jurisdiction, and that CAFC lacked jurisdiction over Mr. Davis’s appeal.
CAFC review of decisions by the Veterans Court is limited by statute. See Wanless v. Shinseki, 618 F.3d 1333, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2010). CAFC may review and decide challenges to the validity or interpretation of any statute or regulation and may interpret constitutional and statutory provisions if presented and necessary to the decision. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(c). But absent a legitimate constitutional issue, CAFC cannot review challenges to the Veterans Court’s factual determinations or its application of law to fact. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2); see also Wanless, 618 F.3d at 1336. It should be noted that the scope of the Veterans Court’s jurisdiction presents a legal question within CAFC jurisdiction to review. See Goss v. McDonough, 122 F.4th 1332, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2024). The interpretation of the contents of a claim for benefits is a factual issue over which CAFC does not have jurisdiction.